Conceptual Modelar
Conceptual ModelarCausal knowledge from your documents
Connecting…

Social Network Analysis

Concepts are read as actors and causal links as directed ties, so the classic SNA toolkit applies: cohesion, centralization, brokerage (structural holes), core–periphery and the dyad / triad census (Wasserman & Faust 1994; Borgatti, Everett & Johnson 2018).

Sociogram who is tied to whom

Scroll to zoom, drag to pan. Click an actor to highlight its ties (and open its ego network below); double-click to inspect it. Click a cluster in the key to highlight it.

Clusters Louvain communities

Groups of actors more tied to each other than to the rest. The gatekeeper has the most ties leaving the cluster.

Key bridges edge betweenness

The ties that the most shortest paths run through — cut one and parts of the network drift apart. Click to highlight.

Actor centrality table

Click a column to sort, a row to inspect the concept. Degree counts ties; closeness, betweenness and eigenvector are normalised 0–1. Low constraint with high effective size marks a broker spanning structural holes (Burt 1992).

Centrality profile

The most connected actors across seven measures, as percentile rank among all actors (darker = more central). Actors central on every measure are robustly important; mixed profiles show different kinds of power.

Ego network

An actor's direct contacts (alters) and the ties among them.

Brokerage & structural holes

Burt's constraint (low = contacts are not connected to each other, so the actor bridges gaps) against betweenness. Brokers sit top-left.

Degree distribution

How many actors have each number of incoming and outgoing ties. A long tail means a few hubs dominate.

Core–periphery (k-cores)

A k-core is a group where every actor has at least k ties inside the group. The highest core is the network's cohesive centre.

Dyad & triad census

Key concepts

Transmitters & receivers

Out-degree against in-degree (Özesmi). Concepts below the diagonal push the system; those above it are pushed by it. Size = centrality; click a point to inspect it.

Leverage points FCM sensitivity

Feedback loops

Reinforcing loops amplify change (even number of − links); balancing loops counteract it. Click a loop to show it on the map.

Modules themes found in the map

Communities of concepts that link mostly to each other (greedy modularity, as in the map colours). Cohesion = share of a module's links that stay inside it. Click a module to show it on the map.

Causal path finder

How does one concept affect another? Each path's effect is the product of its link weights.

✦

Ask your documents

Answers blend the most relevant passages with the causal map, and every claim is cited.

Condense the map

Fold all concepts and their links into a set number of concepts, then see every analysis — map, matrix, network analysis, scenarios and exports — on the condensed map.

How many concepts? 30
fewer, broader conceptsmore, finer concepts
How it works

The build_per_map method: the model designs the condensed concepts from the most-mentioned concepts, every concept is assigned by embedding similarity, and the most-mentioned assignments are re-checked by the model. Link weights are then re-aggregated between the condensed concepts. Takes about a minute.

Publication figure preview
Rendering with fcm_figure…

Change password

At least 8 characters, with letters and a number. Other devices are signed out.

Background

What is a fuzzy cognitive map?

A fuzzy cognitive map (FCM) is a semi-quantitative model of how people understand a system. It was introduced by Bart Kosko (1986) as a parameterised form of concept mapping: the concepts are the parts of the system that can increase or decrease, and the directed links between them say how a change in one concept pushes another — up (+) or down (−), with a strength between 0 and 1.

Because every link has a sign and a weight, the map can be run: activate a concept (a policy, a shock, a driver) and let the influence spread through the links until the system settles. Comparing that state with the baseline is a scenario analysis — the model answers “what happens to everything else if this changes?”

Participatory modellingGroups build a shared model of a problem and test options together before deciding.
Social-science researchMaps measure the mental models behind people's decisions and can be compared across individuals and groups.
From documentsConceptual Modelar builds the map from interviews and reports automatically, keeping the quote behind every link.

Kosko, B. (1986). Fuzzy cognitive maps. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 24, 65–75. · Özesmi, U. & Özesmi, S. L. (2004). Ecological models based on people's knowledge: a multi-step fuzzy cognitive mapping approach. Ecological Modelling, 176, 43–64. · Gray, S. A., Gray, S., Cox, L. J. & Henly-Shepard, S. (2013). Mental Modeler: a fuzzy-logic cognitive mapping modeling tool for adaptive environmental management. Proc. 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

Administrator

Access requests

Approve people before they can use the app.

Library

My outputs

Every graph, analysis, simulation, answer and download from your account — filed by project in six folders.

Methods

How the analyses work

What each part of the workspace computes, the formulas, and how to read the results.

New project

A project holds its own documents, concepts and links.